Dear experts,
As far as I understood, the first 22 bytes of Thread-Index prefix should not change within a Conversation.
In light of the aforementioned, does the following scenario seem right or buggy to you?
We have email conversations broken apart as shown below:
User A replies to the conversation with Letter 1
Thread-Index: Ac4jv85MRhFu7QhERbKaF8pLydgqdwAB/D1wAADnl6AAACAQYAAC7pqwAAfVgNA= Message-ID: <19B63325BE2CFC46BEF700840FCF20C21DFDCE26@server.domain.com>
Then User B replies to Letter 1 with Letter 2 and it gets a new thread index
Thread-Index: AQJfdSYIJwWwuE6hsmpYz6axV1de1AGPBYqIAhHicsMCTkJSrgF7la7mAcuI2t6XP1GHsA== Message-ID: <77AA8A767669B64E98FCE3D6C3F027911E079BCF@server.domain.com> References: <4BD6386511C73F459815BB515507E0FA1556D688@server.domain.com><D39A7BBCDCEAA9428055B009609CABCD1E0C3CB3@server.domain.com><4BD6386511C73F459815BB515507E0FA1556D6A6@server.domain.com><293D3F037075C941A27FC2F81EACB11F1E0D41BB@server.domain.com><D39A7BBCDCEAA9428055B009609CABCD1E0C3D8E@server.domain.com><19B63325BE2CFC46BEF700840FCF20C21DFDCE26@server.domain.com> In-Reply-To: <19B63325BE2CFC46BEF700840FCF20C21DFDCE26@server.domain.com>
Then User A responds to Letter 2 with Letter 3 that returns the initial thread index prefix
Thread-Index: Ac4jv85MRhFu7QhERbKaF8pLydgqdwAB/D1wAADnl6AAACAQYAAC7pqwAAfVgND//73BgP//vDQw Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:44:34 +0400 Message-ID: <19B63325BE2CFC46BEF700840FCF20C21DFDCE57@server.domain.com> References: <4BD6386511C73F459815BB515507E0FA1556D688@server.domain.com><D39A7BBCDCEAA9428055B009609CABCD1E0C3CB3@server.domain.com><4BD6386511C73F459815BB515507E0FA1556D6A6@server.domain.com><293D3F037075C941A27FC2F81EACB11F1E0D41BB@server.domain.com><D39A7BBCDCEAA9428055B009609CABCD1E0C3D8E@server.domain.com><19B63325BE2CFC46BEF700840FCF20C21DFDCE26@server.domain.com><77AA8A767669B64E98FCE3D6C3F027911E079BCF@server.domain.com> In-Reply-To: <77AA8A767669B64E98FCE3D6C3F027911E079BCF@server.domain.com>
Both users have Microsoft Outlook 2010.